Friday, April 1, 2011

April 10, 2011. Fifth Sunday in Lent

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


Almighty God, you alone can bring into order the unruly wills and affections of sinners: Grant your people grace to love what you command and desire what you promise; that, among the swift and varied changes of the world, our hearts may surely there be fixed where true joys are to be found; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.


So much has this collect comforted me throughout my life that I am reluctant to bring to it the close scrutiny which I have brought to so many others in the Queer Eye series, but I will nonetheless.

The psalm encourages our dependence on God  and asserts that by ourselves we sinners cannot bring into order our unruly will and affections. I believe that we might do a better job with our unruly will and affections if we were less quick to give up and ask God to take care of them.   Do we live into the full integrity that God wills for us if from the get-go we disrespect ourselves this much?

A major part of collect's appeal is the clear way it demonstrates how we might order our lives, not by fixing our hearts on the swift and varied changes of the world, but by fixing our hearts on what God commands and on what God promises.

Ezekiel 37:1-14

This is one of the great short stories of all times -- a vision of resurrection where a field full of bones becomes alive with God's creative magic.   God takes that which has been dead and reconnects the parts. Compare with Quean Lutibelle's rendition:


Then he said to me, "Mortal, these bones are the whole of the Episcopal Church. They say, `Our bones are dried up, and our hope is lost; we are living in a post- Christian era and we are cut off completely from our past as Episcopalians and from the great past of Christianity itself.'

Therefore prophesy, and say to them, Thus says the Lord GOD: I am going to open your graves, and bring you up from your graves, O my people; and I will bring you back to the God's realm. And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves, and bring you up from your graves, O my people. I will put my spirit within you, and you shall live, and I will place you on your own soil; then you shall know that I, the Lord, have spoken and will act," says the Lord.


Psalm 130

Did Saint Paul somehow tamper with Psalm 130?  It manifests his major theme that we can never please God if we expect to win his favor by our good behavior.

Other psalms stress that only our good behavior in keeping the law will please God. This psalm says that is a hopeless endeavor with which we can never succeed.  


If you, LORD, were to note what is done amiss, *
O Lord, who could stand?

For there is forgiveness with you.

Saint Paul constantly stressed that the law is too difficult for anyone to keep thoroughly, that we are in desperate need of the grace that Jesus effects.  Saint Paul stressed that we cannot be saved by our own righteousness, but only by Jesus' righteousness.



Romans 8:6-11

Saint locates our sin in our flesh.  He's almost obsessed with the notion that loving God means turning away from the flesh.  He offers no way to experience God's love in the flesh.  He arbitrarily separates the mind and the body, and in Paul's equation, the body always loses.

In the preceding chapter, Paul describes himself as split between the mind and the body:  "For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do." (Romans 7:19, KJV).  In utter exasperation" he cries out, "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? (7:24).

"deliver me from the body"?  

Is the body the problem?  Is sex the problem?  Is carnal desire the problem?  Are we wise to seek deliverance from the body and its desires?

The author of Genesis had no such contempt for the flesh.  About all of creation, God said, "It is good!"

I disagree with Saint on this issue.  He seems a victim of his own Greek education in the artificial division of the mind and the body.

Poet William Blake wrote parallel sequences of poems, one called the "Songs of Innocence" and the other "Songs of Experience."

An example of Blake's "Songs of Innocence" is


The Lamb

Little Lamb, who made thee?
Dost thou know who made thee?
Gave thee life, & bid thee feed
By the stream & o'er the mead;
Gave thee clothing of delight;
Softest clothing, wooly, bright;
Gave thee such a tender voice,
Making all the vales rejoice?
Little Lamb, who made thee?
Dost thou know who made thee?


Little Lamb, I'll tell thee,
Little Lamb, I'll tell thee:
He is called by thy name,
For he calls himself a Lamb.
He is meek, & he is mild;
He became a little child.
I a child, & thou a lamb,
We are called by his name.
Little Lamb, God bless thee!
Little Lamb, God bless thee  


An example of Blake's "Songs of Experience" is


The Tyger

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?


In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder, & what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand? & what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And water'd heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye,
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?


God made both the lamb and the tiger.  Blake encourages us to live within the tension of God's diversity, not to choose just one, the tiger or the lamb.

I believe that God wants us as mature Christians to integrate both mind and body, body and soul, not to dismiss the one to have the other.   I offer my own song of experience, as an x-rated vision of God's loving creation:




Watching the Watcher

I watched God when He made
Adam's penis,
matched it with his own,
checked it out for size,
for accordianability,
and for fit and feel
in a dozen orifices;
and I swear
He was happy,
did not draw the curtain,
never smirked,
but winked,
even blinked in anticipation.

I watched God as She made
Eve's vagina,
measured it with Her delicate fingers,
nudged out a dimension,
added springs, nectar, slush,
rejected the notion
of a finger-like protrusion
self-insertable at the entrance,
purred to experience
for the first time
the joy for which
Eve was being made.

John 11:1-45

This is a Christian variation on the Ezekiel story.  Both deal with death and resurrection.  The bones in Ezekiel's story have long been dry and free of flesh.  Lazarus has been dead four days, and there is a stench, Martha notes, warning Jesus lest in his grief he might not have noticed.

Small boys like to mine this passage for trivia.  "Jesus wept" (11:35) is the shortest verse in the bible.  The syntax suggests the short pulse of one grieving as Jesus is grieving.

But John invites us backstage to appreciate Jesus' mastery of theatrics.  Jesus knows that all he has to do is ask God quietly to bring Lazarus back to life, but he wants those in the crowds to have a richer spectacle,  

Jesus thanks God for "having [already] heard me" but calls out "Lazarus, come out!" for the crowd to hear.  John reports that Jesus indulges in good theater "for the sake of the crowd standing here, so that they may believe that you [God] sent me."

This story resonates profoundly with the experience of many lgbt Christians:

"Louie, come out!"
"Ernest, come out!"
"Hazel, come out!"
"Myrtle, come out!"....

The secrecy of the closet stultifies. Many experience it as being buried alive, being cut off from wholeness, and vitality. It buys 'respectability' at a fearful price of our very wholeness.

"Come out! Come out!" Jesus beckons.


See also

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Sunday, April 3, 2011. Fourth Sunday in Lent

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


Gracious Father, whose blessed Son Jesus Christ came down from heaven to be the true bread which gives life to the world: Evermore give us this bread, that he may live in us, and we in him; who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.


My parents died in 1982, Mother in January, Dad in July.   After each funeral I stayed with their friend and contemporary Mrs. W. B. Moore, who had tutored me in Latin in the 9th and 10th grades.  Mama Moore was a member of Parker Memorial Baptist Church where my parents had been members, the place where I was baptized at age 8, the place which licensed me as a Southern Baptist preacher in March 1954 as I prepared to enter Baylor University that fall.

After my father's funeral, Mama Moore and I had a quiet meal and then sat in her large den (she called it a 'hutch').   "Louie," she said, "I don't believe in the after life. I don't have any need to upset my friends at Parker Memorial by telling them, but I just don't.  I believe that the only life we have when we die is in the influence we have on those whom we have loved.  Louie, don't ever stop loving your parents.  Something very vital in you would die."

"Evermore give us this bread that Jesus may live in us, and we in him."

Without naming it, Mama Moore was  describing how Jesus chooses to be resurrected in 2011.  That's why we Episcopalians call it Eucharist,  from Greek εὐχαριστία (eucharistia), which means "thanksgiving".  The Baptists stress that the Lord's Supper is a Remembrance, in which we re-Member Jesus.  We make Jesus a member of us again.  We elect to remain a part of him.

1 Samuel 16:1-13  

I have served on numerous search committees.  I was co-chair of the committee that nominated candidates for our most recent episcopal election in the Diocese of Newark, and I was secretary of the nominating committee for the episcopal election before that.  I recently served on General Convention's joint standing nominating  committee. I also served two terms on the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Newark, which with the bishop, had a deciding vote on  whether or not a postulant could become a candidate and be ordained.   Also during 44 years as a professor I served on numerous hiring committees.

I undertake such assignments expecting the Holy Spirit to be available to help us discern the best fits, but I don't want to blame all our choices on God.  Jesus himself chose one bad egg out of a dozen.

Samuel offers an important model of how to go about discernment, but a troublesome one.  Don't always choose  from the first pickings.  Ask to see those not on view, those tending sheep. "The Lord does not see as mortals see; they look on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart."


Psalm 23

While teaching English at Er Wai, Beijing's Second Foreign Language Institute, 1983-84, I was asked to give  several lectures at large on the subject of rhetoric, the discipline that looks closely at the strategies a writer or speaker uses to connect to the audience.   For one of my lectures in this officially atheist setting, I chose to look at how the psalmist connects with those who speak the psalm, those who use it.

Note closely the grammatical point of view.  At the beginning the psalm is in the first person singular, "The  Lord is my shepherd.   I will not be without anything I need. He...."

Note well how sheep relate to shepherds.  The psalmist is prescribing that those who say or read the psalm will  take the same relatively docile and totally dependent relationship with God.

In verses 2 and 3 the speaker of psalm talks about God in the third person, "He make me lie down,  he leads me, he revives me, he guides me.

But in verse 4, subtly and dramatically the speaker shifts from third person to second person when taking about  God.


Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I shall fear no evil; *
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff, they comfort me....


The psalm never returns just to talk about God:  it talks to God.

If you are not a believer, you might jump on this rhetoric as an example of how religion and opium collaborate  to dull critical thinking:  without negotiating whether or not the faith claims are valid, the worshiper has been 'suckered' into them.

But if you a believer, you may have already dealt with you doubts.  You may also have concluded that faith, by  definition, is something spiritual, the substance of things hoped for, not the evidence of things seen.

The imagery works powerfully on the speaker as well.  Even when we are surrounded by those who wish us  harm, God always brings us a feast.

Imagine what that reality means to lgbt Christians in Uganda.  Imagine what that means when those who seek to harm you are kept at the edges where they observe you enjoying the  feast, not worried about them at all.


Ephesians 5:8-14

As a gay person I lived too many years in darkness, in hiding, ashamed of who I am, fearful that I might act on  who I am, scared that all my efforts to become heterosexual were not working, convinced, even with an abundance  of evidence to the contrary, that all courage and goodness was the exclusive province of straight people, that  God could not possibly love me or anyone like me....

Indeed, once I was in darkness, but now in the Lord I live as a child of light and try to do what is pleasing to the Lord.  I did not find a way to become a heterosexual, but I did find ways to try to be the best  homosexual person I can be, with God's help.

Much of that was made possible in my marriage to Ernest Clay, truly a sacrament, an outward and visible sign of  an inward transforming grace.


"Sleeper, awake!
Rise from the dead,
and Christ will shine on you."



John 9:1-41

John makes it sound like there were a powerful lot of Anglicans present when Jesus performed his miracles on  sinners.   When they couldn't fault the obvious evidence that the blind could now see, that Jesus had made them whole, they faulted Jesus on a technicality:  he had healed them on the sabbath, breaking the law.


So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, "Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner."

He answered, "I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do  know, that though I was blind, now I see."

They said to him, "What did he do to you? How did he open your  eyes?"

He answered them, "I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?"

Then they reviled him...


Get over it, ++Henry Orombi.  Get over it, ++Nicholas Dikeriehi Okoh.  Get over it, ++Onesphore Rwaje...  Get over it, all 8 primates who boycotted Presiding Bishop and Primate Katharine Jefferts Schori.  ""'Show up' to heal the world."




See also

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

March 27, 2011. Third Sunday in Lent



© 2011 by Louie Crew



The Collect

Almighty God, you know that we have no power in ourselves to help ourselves: Keep us both outwardly in our bodies and inwardly in our souls, that we may be defended from all adversities which may happen to the body, and from all evil thoughts which may assault and hurt the soul; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.


Do we really have no power in ourselves to help ourselves?   Then we’re in a big mess.

It’s in the DNA of most Americans to believe that God helps those who help themselves.

Are we to be God’s co-dependents, God depending on our complete resignation, we depending on God's taking care of all our business?  

Exodus 17:1-7

I have serious problems with this narrative.   It’s a close call as to who is less attractive in it, Moses?  Or God?

The people are thirsty.  What on earth is wrong with that?  That’s the way God plumbed the body.  Moses has been happy to have them honor him as their leader; why make a big deal out of an understandable expectation that leaders lead?

Jane Byrne famously won election as mayor of Chicago running against incumbent Michael Belandic who seemed incompetent in providing snow removal three months earlier, in January 1979. 

Taking care of basic community needs is part of the job description of the leader, and a part of the job description of a God worthy of recognition.   Yet God’s snit tops Moses’ snit when the people say they are thirsty.  

In his own defense, God says they liked it well enough when God gave Moses the power to lead them out of slavery.  What’s a little thing like being thirsty?!   

For their disrespect God punishes them by making them wander in the desert for 40 years, so that only their children will be free of the taint the parents have brought upon themselves merely by saying, We are thirsty!

With help from God, Moses puts on a great show of giving the people the water they asked for.  Photo-ops are not strictly a 21st century phenomenon.   Leaders have been putting their faces on commemorative plaques on public buildings for millennia.

Psalm 95

I prefer to read/say this psalm without including verses 8-11 – an explicit reference to today’s Exodus selection.  I hope that the adoration of God so well stated in the first seven verses is spontaneous and authentic, not just a way to placate the God of the Great Snit, the God who flips out if you get thirsty at an inconvenient time.
  
Romans 5:1-11

Saint’s God is almost unrecognizable in the God of the Great Snit portrayed in Exodus.   When the people were thirsty, the God of the Great Snit despised them.  Yet Saint’s God is most accommodating and patient when we might least expect it: 

For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. Indeed, rarely will anyone die for a righteous person-- though perhaps for a good person someone might actually dare to die. But God proves his love for us in that while we still were sinners Christ died for us. 


John 4:5-42

How much poorer Christianity would be without this narrative!   I preached at the Integrity Eucharist during General Convention 1994 at Christ Church Cathedral in Indianapolis.  I opened  saying, “Welcome to Samaria. 

I consider the woman at the well my spiritual ancestor.  Samaritans occupied much the same relationship to Jews in Jesus’ day as queers occupy in much of the Anglican Communion right now.

In 1974 a Florida bishop startled the House of Bishops when without warning he asked, “What do you do when you find a queer priest in your diocese?”    The House was less shocked with the notion there might be gay priests than they were that an Episcopal bishop would be so uncouth as to mention them publicly. 

The bishops did what they do often when confronting an explosive situation: they formed a task force.  And as if to prove they really were Episcopalians, they called it the “House of Bishops Task Force on Homophiles in the Ministry.”   Few besides Episcopalians, ever anxious to be delicate, talked that way about us in 1974.   Homophiles ?  Say what?   Give me a break!

I first learned of this group after I founded Integrity in October that year, with announcements in The Advocate and The Living Church.   It’s anyone guess as to which of these two publications members of the Task Force read, but I received an invitation to come to Washington in November to meet with them, that they might learn who this stranger was from Fort Valley, Georgia, a place none of them had previously heard of either.    

We met without fanfare or public notice in a quiet room at Epiphany, since Henry Bruel, the rector, was a member of the Task Force, as was Rt. Rev. John Walker (then Bishop Suffragan of Washington, later the ordinary).  Others included Rev. Canon Clinton Jones (pioneer regarding counseling lesbians, gays and the transgendered), Bishop David Richards (director of the Office of Pastoral Development, the place to which troublesome bishops are sent), Dr. George Benson, a psychiatrist in St. Louis, and a few others whose name now escape me).

Jesus’ assignation with the Samaritan woman at the well was sub rosa as well.   Respectable Jewish men did not hang out with Samaritan women.  Samaritan women knew they could cause less hassle if they washed clothes in the heat of the day.  

John’s narrative is high camp.  Knowing that she has no husband, Jesus asks about a husband any way.   When she replies she does not have one, he teases, “You have spoken truly, because you have had six husbands and the one with whom you are living right now is not one of them.”  Zap!

She teases right back trying to start a theological argument about where to worship God, either here in Samaria as her people teach or in Jerusalem where his people teach. 

Jesus does not take the bait.  Instead he shifts to a deeper level of candor.   Neither group is right.   That’s not the way we experience God.  God is not the private property of any religious community.  God can’t be owned or pinned down to our own expectations.  God is a spirit and we worship God in spirit and in truth.  We, all of us, are the ones with whom God seeks this relationship.

She is excited and tells everyone not “He told me all my sins” (which in a sense he had done), but “He told me everything I have ever done.” 

Unlike Moses or God in today’s passage from Exodus, Jesus cared more about her thirst than about her sin.  He offered her living water.

When Jesus’ disciples showed up, they, much like Jesus’ disciples today, did not like the company he kept, They said nothing but registered their shock silently.  After she left, they produced the fast food they had fetched and urged Jesus to eat.  

Jesus was annoyed:  "I have food to eat that you do not know about."

It is not surprising that Samaritans were Jesus’ first ‘success story.’  He had far better results with them than with the Israelites.

It is not surprising that the fastest growing church in India is The Church of South India, principally a  church of the Dalits, the untouchables.  To all untouchables Jesus speaks far more clearly and lovingly than do most of Jesus’ disciples.

+++Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, met with seven of us lgbt folks during the 2009 General Convention in Anaheim.  We each had 90 seconds to make our witness.  I reminded the archbishop that Jesus did not take on leadership in Samaritan Liberation, but Jesus did take many opportunities to bear witness to Israelites about how he had seen God at work through despised Samaritans.   “In the name of Jesus,” I said, “I charge you to do the same.”

Pray for +++Rowan.  Pray for me.  Pray for all Samaritans.




See also




March 20, 2011. Second Sunday in Lent

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


O God, whose glory it is always to have mercy: Be gracious to all who have gone astray from your ways, and bring them again with penitent hearts and steadfast faith to embrace and hold fast the unchangeable truth of your Word, Jesus Christ your Son; who with you and the Holy Spirit lives and reigns, one God, for ever and ever. Amen


Genesis 12:1-4a

In Hebrew scriptures many characters seem larger than life.

  • Noah foresaw the flood and rescued human beings and animals in an arc.
  • Moses led the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt.
  • Saul built the first temple in Jerusalem.
  • David was a beloved king, a musician, and a strong warrior.
  • Elijah was one of the most respected prophets of all time…..


But what did Abram (Abraham) do?  Why is he ascribed great stature in Hebrew Scriptures?


  • Abraham was a nomad who accumulated a fair amount of wealth.
  • In his very old age Abraham fathered Isaac, who himself is not very remarkable
  • And through his concubine Hagar Abraham fathered yet another son, Ishmael.


Those ‘achievements’ do not compete well with the heroics of many others in the Biblical narrative.  Yet three modern religions trace their lineage through Abraham – Judaism through Isaac, Islam through Ishmael, and Christianity through Jesus through David through Isaac….

In today’s epistle, Saint Paul imputes holy celebrity status to Abraham because he did without question what God asked him to do. He trusted God had good reasons – even when he thought God asked him to sacrifice Isaac.   Abraham’s faith, his trust, was reckoned as righteousness.

 “So Abram went, as the Lord had told him.”

Psalm 121


I lift up my eyes to the hills; *
from where is my help to come?


Note that the verse ends with a question mark.  Although no punctuation appears in the oldest manuscripts, bible scholars translate the text as an interrogative.

Where does the speaker expect to find his help?  From the hills?   From high places?    No!:


My help comes from the LORD, *
the maker of heaven and earth.


I rejoice that those who compile the lectionary appointed Psalm 121 for the second Sunday in Lent.  It is not penitential.   The speaker does not grovel.  The speaker does not cry out in pain that withers, as the speaker did in the psalm for the first Sunday in Lent.  

If we expect to address our sin and our guilt seriously, as Lent invites us to, we need just as seriously to address the consolation that God offers to us.   In the rest of the psalm the speaker addresses the rest of us, with some of the most comforting words in all the Bible:


[God] will not let your foot be moved *
and he who watches over you will not fall asleep.

Behold, he who keeps watch over Israel *
shall neither slumber nor sleep;

The LORD himself watches over you; *
the LORD is your shade at your right hand,

So that the sun shall not strike you by day, *
nor the moon by night.

The LORD shall preserve you from all evil; *
it is he who shall keep you safe.

The LORD shall watch over your going out and your coming in, *
from this time forth for evermore.


So be it.  AMEN

Romans 4:1-5, 13-17

Saint Paul spent much of his early life trying to follow the law to the letter.  In his zeal, Paul was present at the stoning of Stephen, the first martyr.    Yet when he converted to Christianity Paul radically departed from the view that righteousness comes by our right actions.   With that standard, no one can win, he reckoned; we will all fall short of earning our way into heaven if the goal depends on how good or how right we are.  We don’t earn our way; Jesus paid our way for us.   We have salvation by God’s free gift through Jesus.

Abraham’s simple, straight-forward trust of God is not simple for Paul:  it is a means of Grace and is accounted to Abraham as righteousness.

John 3:1-17

Many say to lgbt people, You must be born again!   You are not meant to be lesbian or gay or bisexual or transgendered.   Those are not you.   You must be born again.

Believing those people, many a night through my adolescence I prayed “Make me a heterosexual, God,”    When Playboy Magazine first appeared (1953), I bought copies in an effort to rewire my circuits heterosexually; but it prompted no arousal.  And my involuntary fantasies remained stolidly homosexual.

I felt that God had made me the piece of junk that so many took us queers to be.  

I was like Nicodemus thinking that I would have to go back into my mother’s womb and exit it properly.

“Not so,” Jesus told him.  “Get a life.  Get a new life of the spirit.”

God never made my homosexuality go away but performed a great miracle:  God gave me a new life, a new spirit as a gay person striving to be the best gay person I could be.

John 3:16 is possibly the most memorized bible verse of all time.   It is perverse to read it as, “"For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that every heterosexual who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.”

Just what part of “Whosoever” so difficult to understand?


"Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him."


Woe unto those who hoard this good news as a private secret.

Nor is it a secret for lgbt persons to hoard privately.   Having experienced so great salvation, let us share the good news everywhere:  God loves absolutely everybody.




See also

March 13, 2011. The First Sunday in Lent

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


Almighty God, whose blessed Son was led by the Spirit to be tempted by Satan: Come quickly to help us who are assaulted by many temptations; and, as you know the weaknesses of each of us, let each one find you mighty to save; through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.


It’s Sin Time again, with a capital ‘S’.   While the Prayer Book provides for us to confess daily, the church calendar devotes 40 full days, most of them delightful spring days in the Northern Hemisphere, to temptation – our need to be on guard against it and our need to confess fully when we have fallen into it.  The church risks coming across as saying to spring, when the ‘young’s fancy turns to, well, love, beware!”

Ironically ads for E.D. medications probably are most effective when they warn, “If your erection lasts for more than four hours, consult your doctor.”   “No,” responds a septuagenarian friend married to an octogenarian with increasing dementia,”  “No,” she responds, “call me!”

Today’s collect offers solace to those with ears to hear:  You are not alone!  We are all right there with you.   We are all “assaulted by many temptations.”

Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-7

Hear God’s voice calling out in the huge garden:   “Eva!  Eva!   Where are you?   Eva!”

“Louie!   Louie!   Where are you?   Louie!”

Been there?  Done that?

“Bow-Back made me do it,” I answered when my parents asked why I had done what they told me not to do.  “I didn’t do it; Bow-Back did.  Don’t blame me!”

“Eva!  Eva!  Where are you?   Eva!”

Of course, males wrote this version.  God does not call out, “Adam!  Adam!  Where are you?  Adam!”

If confronted, Adam could say, “Eve made me do it.   Don’t blame me; blame her!”

“Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made loincloths for themselves.”

Before this they were naked but did not see their nakedness.   Now they make loin clothes, and ever since then most people in the world cover principal sexual parts.  

For the writer of Genesis, the misconduct of our first parents explains the presence of death, pain, toil….   You name it:  if it is undesirable, Eve made it happen.


Psalm 32  

It is not uncommon for men to say, “If she had not be so seductive and scantily clad, I would not have done it….  She made me do it!”

The psalmist offers a rejoinder:


Do not be like horse or mule, which have no understanding; *
who must be fitted with bit and bridle,
or else they will not stay near you."


We must grow up.  We must take responsibility for our own actions!

The psalmist imitates the speech of one who has not repented:


While I held my tongue, my bones withered away, *
because of my groaning all day long.


Guilt is indeed withering.   Confession offers healing.


Happy are they whose transgressions are forgiven, *
and whose sin is put away!

Happy are they to whom the LORD imputes no guilt, *
and in whose spirit there is no guile!  


The story is told of two gay young men in Manhattan who on Friday night headed for the Village.  When they passed by St. Patrick’s Cathedral, one said to the other, “Wait here for me for 10 minutes.  I need to make my confession.”

“That’s what I don’t understand about you Catholics!” his friend complained.  “You know you are headed to the Village to sin as much as you can yet you stop off beforehand to make your confession.”

“Ah, ever the Presbyterian,” the young man replied.  “You protestants rarely get it right.   A sailor knows that a ship will continue to get barnacles, but when does that ever stop him from removing the barnacles with a good routine scrub down?”

“Well, that does sound convincing,” replied the Presbyterian.

“Why don’t you come in with me and make your own confession.  It will do your heart good.  All you have to do is say, ‘Father, since my last confession I have……’ and name your sins.  Then the priest will give you something specific to do as penance.”

They made their way to adjoining booths.  Ten minutes later the Catholic was done, but he could see his friend’s shoes still in the booth.  Thirty minutes later his friend was still in there.   “This is ridiculous!  I should have explained that he doesn’t have to go on forever.  He must be confessing everything he has ever done.  I’m out of here.”

In the wee hours of the next morning he made his way back to the building where they shared an apartment.  The Presbyterian was not there.   Nor was he there on Sunday, or on Monday….   Finally, on Tuesday evening, the Presbyterian showed up, looking horrible. His clothes were filthy.  But his face shone.

“Thanks for getting me to make my confession,” his friend said.  “But you will never believe what the priest gave me for penance.”

“What?” the Catholic asked.

“He said I had to do all the stations.  Do you have any idea how many there are in Manhattan?!

[On hearing this story, a Monsignor told a friend of mine, "I'll never give the stations as a penance again until I know for sure that the penitent knows what they are!"]

Romans 5:12-19

As one might in a good sermon illustration, Paul compares Jesus with Adam.  Jesus reverses Adam’s mistake.   Sin came into the world through one person, Adam; sin is overcome in the world through one person, Jesus.   Because of Adam’s sin, all human beings had to die.   Because of Jesus’ righteousness, all might be forgiven and be able to live forever.

This is the locus classicus for the Doctrine of Original Sin, but it is possible that Paul was writing a good sermon illustration but not intentionally forming the hard and fast doctrine which many later Christians have made of it.

Jews wrote Genesis and value it still; yet they have not developed a doctrine of Original Sin.  That’s a Christian interpretation of Genesis, and not all Christians believe in Original Sin either.

In its particulars, the Doctrine of Original Sin is hard for many 21st century Christians to take.  Does God demand blood for blood?   Christ’s blood for the blood I would otherwise owe for my own sins?…  That God sounds primitive, even barbaric to many who nevertheless believe Jesus is Lord.

Matthew 4:1-11

The author includes many sexual overtones in Genesis 2.   Most notably, after they have sinned, they “know” that they are naked and make clothes for themselves. Know is a euphemism for sexual intercourse in much of the bible and even today in polite courtroom inquiries:   “Did the defendant ‘know’ his girlfriend?”

After Adam and Eve are expelled from the garden, they have children, and one of the specific penalties Eve pays is to have great pain in childbirth.    God created Adam and Eve without pain.

In narrating Jesus’ great temptations, Matthew does not include sexual temptations.   If Jesus was made in all ways as like unto us yet knew no sin, would he not have had sexual temptations the way we all do?   Did Jesus have wet dreams?

Scripture and church tradition are moot on these points.  In fact, many view such questions as sacrilegious.

The three temptations that Matthew records are


  1. A temptation to use a miracle to feed himself.
  2. A temptation to use a miracle to show off his power to the people
  3. A temptation to worship Satan to gain power over all the dominions Satan controls


The first is hardly a challenge from Jenny Craig or Weight-Watchers.  He is seriously hungry.  Try fasting for forty days.

In all three instances Satan tempts Jesus to abuse his power to make his life easier; Jesus rejects all three.

Most Christians still expect Jesus in his next coming to be King of Kings and Lord of Lords, to get it right, as it were, and put all other gods under his feet.

Might we be as wrong in these expectations as the Israelites were in their expectations when God first came as Jesus?  Might we be looking still in all the wrong places?  Might there still be no room for him in the Inn?  Might we see him more clearly in the smiling eyes of a very hungry child or in the kindness of the Samaritan who takes the orthodox out of the ditch, tends their wounds, and pays the bills?

Matthew assumes that Satan is in control of “all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.”  Jesus does not naysay that claim; he merely refuses to worship Satan.  Have we any reason to conclude that Satan has lost this control?





See also

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

March 6, 2011. The Last Sunday after Epiphany

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


O God, who before the passion of your only begotten Son revealed his glory upon the holy mountain: Grant to us that we, beholding by faith the light of his countenance, may be strengthened to bear our cross, and be changed into his likeness from glory to glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever.  Amen.


Exodus 24:12-18

This passage reads like bona fides for Moses.  People did not elect him:  God chose him.  Moses went up on the mountain alone, and he stayed there forty days and forty nights.

When persons run for President of the United States, typically they run for close to 600 days and nights, and  they don’t benefit from the presumption that they are spending time close to God.


Now the appearance of the glory of the LORD was like a devouring fire on the top of the mountain in the sight of the people of Israel.  


Compare those data with date from a major modern example of pyro-techniques”   The fire in the collapsed twin towers of the World Trade Center burned for 99 days

Psalm 2

God seldom  laughs in the whole of the bible, but Jesus laughs often.  See my 1973 article Did Jesus Laugh, first published in The Lutheran Forum.

Yet in the second psalm, the “kings of the earth rise up in revolt, and the princes plot together against the LORD and against the Lord’s  anointed:"

God responds by laughing.  He derides them, as if to say, “I gotcha!”

Rarely do we imagine Jesus mocking his enemies.   He taught, “Do not return evil for evil.... Bless those who curse you.  Do good to those that spitefully use you and say all manner of evil against you falsely for my sake.”

2 Peter 1:16-21

Peter lays out his own bona fides.   Although  we have no fool-proof way to check them out 2,000 years after the fact, Peter certainly seems to feel it important that we accept what the he and other eye witnesses as accurate.

When Peter speaks of the prophecy in Scripture, he is not referring to Christian scriptures, but to Hebrew scriptures, the only scriptures he knew.  He asserts that the Holy Spirit  spoke through God in the creation of those scriptures.

Peter observes that their reports more fully confirm the prophecies in Hebrew Scripture.

Peter asserts that he and others who report the power and coming of our Lord Jesus report what they have seen with their own eyes.  They were present at Jesus’ baptism when the Holy Spirit descended and said, “This is my Son, my Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.”


Matthew 17:1-9

More bona fides;  for Jesus this time.   The transfiguration places Jesus in the company of Moses and Elijah, two major spiritual icons.    

It’s such a moving triumvirate, that Peter, James and John, allowed to witness it, don’t want to leave.  Peter says:  “Lord, it is good for us to be here; if you wish, I will make three dwellings here, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.”

From spontaneious religious experience to church architecture:  ever was it thus.

Rather than trust spiritual experience to regenerate itself, Peter, James and John, like many throughout religious history, want to preserve the experience in permanent dwellings.

God interrupts suddenly with a bright cloud that overshadows them, and a voice affirms of Jesus in almost the same terms that the Holy Spirit had used at Jesus’ baptism:  "This is my Son, the Beloved; with him I am well pleased; listen to him!"

Jesus ignores his disciples' plea stay enraptured on the mountain.  “He came and touched them, saying, ‘Get up and do not be afraid.’ And when they looked up, they saw no one except Jesus himself alone.”

When we have had a powerful experience of God, often we want it to last forever.   Yet manna, God’s holy food for our journey, cannot be freeze-dried.   It comes in ample supply for only one day at a time.  Any leftovers rot





The readings from Exodus, 2nd Peter, and Matthew all emphasize spiritual credentials – Moses’, the apostles’, and Jesus’.  What about our own?

In John 13:35, Jesus said, “By this shall all know that you are his disciples if you have love one for another.”    If you were put on trial as a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you.”

Today's collect emphasizes that the transfiguration occurred before the passion, adding:  “Grant to us that we, beholding by faith the light of his countenance, may be strengthened to bear our cross, and be changed into his likeness from glory to glory.”




See also

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

February 27, 2011. Eighth Sunday after the Epiphany.

© 2011 by Louie Crew


Today’s Lections

The Collect


Most loving Father, whose will it is for us to give thanks for all things, to fear nothing but the loss of you, and to cast all our care on you who care for us: Preserve us from faithless fears and worldly anxieties, that no clouds of this mortal life may hide from us the light of that love which is immortal, and which you have manifested to us in your Son Jesus Christ our Lord; who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen


Do you experience insistent “faithless fears”?

Is it faithless to have anxiety about the fate of planet earth?  Or is that fear faithful?

Was the father faithless to be anxious when his prodigal son took his inheritance and squandered it in riotous living far away from home?  When he saw his son returning far down the road, he ordered that the fattened calf be made into veal scaloppini, and dashed to embrace him, “For this my son who was lost is found!”

Jesus taught us to pray for God’s kingdom to exist not just in heaven, but here on earth.   Jesus taught us to pray for God’s will to be done not just in heaven, but here on earth.  

Those are wrong who proclaim that politics and religion should not mix.  They must mix if we are to have good religion or good politics.

Rather than seek deliverance from anxiety, we might use our anxiety to prompt us to act righteously.

Should we really cast all our cares on God?  Is that a way to treat our friend Jesus?

This Collect is the intoxicating opiate that Marx warned about – a drugged dependence on God rather than a faithful acceptance of the vitality and capacity that God has given us.

Atheist George Bernhard Shaw faithfully warned:  “Beware of the one whose God is in the skies” (“Maxims for the Revolutionary” in Man and Superman (1903).

Beware of love which is so immortal that you have no need to act on it until death.


The grave’s a fine and private place,
But none, I think, do there embrace

  -- Andrew Marvel.


Isaiah 49:8-16a


The Lord says to the prisoners, "Come out"… to those who are in darkness, "Show yourselves."…. The Lord …will have compassion on his suffering ones.


“If your high school is a safe place for lesbian and gay students to come out, please stand.”

Only three students remained seated when this request was made at a recent conference of the National Association of Independent Schools.

Lgbt students need data far more accurate than this in determining whether to “come out” and “show themselves.”  Likely several students stood just to make their schools look good, with no close attention to the stark risks which lgbts face if they show themselves.  

A friend is proud that her granddaughter and two classmates at an Episcopal high school had the courage to remain seated.  The grandmother is strategizing with the three regarding how to persuade administrators to restore the Gay-Straight Alliance which they disbanded when a few parents complained.  The parents did not want their children even to hear about such people.

How comfortable would prisoners feel sitting on the pew with you.  How comfortable do you feel when face to face with “the least” among us?

Isaiah’s rhetoric can easily sound reassuring if we hear in it only about God’s deliverance of our spiritual ancestors in a time thousands of years ago.   How comfortable are we to allow God to use us as agents of deliverance for prisoners and those who are in darkness right now?

Psalm 131

With only two verses Psalm 117 is the shortest psalm in the bible:


 Praise the LORD, all you nations;
   extol him, all you peoples.

For great is his love toward us,
   and the faithfulness of the LORD endures forever.

   Praise the LORD.


With only four verses, Psalm 131 is not far behind.  Perhaps if we say if four times we’ll be closer to knowing it by heart

My take on the first verse:


O LORD, I am not proud; *
I have no haughty looks.


I might say this to God, but would others say the same thing about me?

Would the beggar to whom I nodded “No” as I left Dunkin Donuts this morning say of me, “He is not proud.  He does not look haughty?”

I might feel better about myself if I invited her in with me and bought breakfast for her. I might also use my communications gifts to promote laws that would assure that fewer people needed to beg, free of the caprice of how generous I feel day to day.

My take on Verse 2

Would we want the President of the United States to pray?:


I do not occupy myself with great matters, *
or with things that are too hard for me.


If our child comes to us with a great matter that is very hard, should we respond with this verse?

The text invites us to think of ourselves more lowly than we ought to think.  It promotes a humility that diminishes our spiritual resources.

My take on Verse 3


But I still my soul and make it quiet,
like a child upon its mother's breast; *
my soul is quieted within me.


I like the speaker’s acceptance of personal responsibility.  “I still my soul, [God]”, not “God, please still my soul.”  

The speaker summons an image of earlier stillness common to most human beings, when we were unweaned.

Soul can get us there.   Spiritual sedation is efficacious. We do not need Tylenol or aspirin.

The verse, indeed the whole psalm, has potential as a “speech act”; that is, with it the speaker purports to cause something to happen, and does not merely describe what might happen.

“With this ring I thee wed” is also a speech act, as is “I now pronounce you husband and husband” if said in Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Washington, D.C., or in the Coquille Indian Tribe in Oregon.  In all other states “I now pronounce you wife and wife” lacks efficacy as a speech act.

Be still, my soul.  Be still.

My take on Verse 4

The first three verses of Psalm 131 are all written in the first person singular, as something the speaker says to God.  Without warning, Verse 4 shifts to the third person:


O Israel, wait upon the LORD, *
from this time forth for evermore.


The shift works to snap a speaker out of private meditation.  It proclaims the public significance of such meditation:  Do this meditation communally forever.

1 Corinthians 4:1-5

As a paragraph in a letter to Christians in the fledgling church at Corinth, this text shows Paul rambling through personal and corporate ethics.  His guiding principle is that we think of ourselves as “stewards.”  He illustrates:  “Moreover, it is required of stewards that they be found trustworthy.”  

But that reflection does not sit well with him.  He’s been in jail enough not to trust his criminal justice system.   He knows too that what he has said and what he plans to say later in this letter will surely make him unpopular with those whom he criticizes in the church in Corinth.

While Paul does not abandon his “stewards” metaphor, he tempers it: “But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court.”

This paragraph is not a good model for establishing how Christians should make ethical decisions.   Saint Paul is writing a letter, not a juridical treatise.  

Witness the problems that Pope Maledict has put himself into, indeed the whole Roman Catholic Church into, by his resistance to being “judged by [other Christians]  or by any human court.”

Matthew 6:24-34

These are not comfortable words to the rich:


"No one can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.


One way to soften this judgment is to exempt oneself as not wealthy.  It’s easy to find many who are far wealthier and then assert their greater wealth as prima facie evidence that they serve wealth more than they serve God.   And yes, we might admit, there are those poorer than ourselves. Even Jesus, we might note, observed “The poor you have with you always.”

My friend Larry Graham warns against such solipsism:


"The poor you will always have with you" is not a commandment.


How does your income compare with incomes of others in the United States?  See the latest summary from the U.S. Census Bureau  For a more global perspective, see  how income in the United States compares with income in most other places.

When God asked murderer Cane where his brother was, Cane replied snidely, “Say what?  Why are you asking me?  Am I my brother’s keeper?!”

Your brother’s prison warden?  No.  Your brother’s brother?  Yes.

Who are my brothers and sisters? “God has made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:26)





See also